
Usually, yes. Where you married does not matter, provided the marriage was valid in that country. What matters is your connection to England and Wales. You can normally start an international divorce here if either of you lives here or is domiciled here, subject to minimum residence periods in some cases, even if your spouse lives abroad.
The court looks at your connection to England and Wales on the date the application is made. Jurisdiction depends on habitual residence or domicile, not nationality or where you married. If one of the legal tests is met, the court can deal with the divorce, finances and, separately, the children.
Under the Domicile and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1973, as amended after Brexit, the court of England and Wales has jurisdiction if, on the date of the application:
Only one test needs to be met. The domicile test in point 7 is the one that most often allows British expats to divorce here even after many years living abroad.
Habitual residence is where your life is currently centred: your home, work, family and social ties, judged on the facts. Domicile is a deeper legal connection. You acquire a domicile of origin at birth, usually your father’s domicile, and keep it unless you move to another country intending to stay there permanently.
This means someone who has lived in Dubai or Singapore for a decade may still be domiciled in England if they always intended to return. Domicile for family law is separate from tax status. The abolition of non-domiciled tax status in April 2025 did not change how domicile works for divorce.
Yes, if the marriage was legally valid in the country where it took place. You will need the original marriage certificate, and a certified English translation if it is in another language. Religious-only ceremonies that were not legally registered abroad may not be recognised as marriages, which affects whether a divorce, or financial claims, are available at all.
Each country applies its own rules to dividing money and property, so the same family can receive very different outcomes depending on where the case is heard. England and Wales is often seen as favourable to the financially weaker spouse, because it shares matrimonial assets equally, assesses needs generously and can order long-term maintenance.
| Approach | Typical features | Examples |
| Discretionary (England and Wales) | Judge weighs all circumstances; equal sharing of matrimonial assets as a starting point; needs met generously; maintenance can be long term | England and Wales |
| Community or deferred community of property | Fixed rules divide property acquired during the marriage; limited judicial discretion; maintenance often short or modest | France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, and some US states such as California |
| Separate property, with limited sharing | Each spouse keeps what is in their own name, with some adjustment | Scotland (sharing limited to matrimonial property), some civil law systems |
| Religious or personal status law | Outcome may depend on religion, nationality or marriage contract | Some Middle Eastern and South Asian countries for Muslim spouses |
These are broad patterns, not rules. Many countries also give effect to a marriage contract or matrimonial property regime chosen at the wedding, which an English court will take into account but is not bound by.
Both countries may have jurisdiction at the same time. Since the UK left the EU, there is no automatic rule that the first court to receive an application keeps the case. Instead, an English court can pause, or stay, its proceedings if another country is clearly the more appropriate place for the case to be heard.
The court looks at where the family has its closest connections, where the assets and children are, what stage each set of proceedings has reached, and fairness to both spouses. Starting first does not guarantee the case stays here, but it often helps, and a spouse who delays can find the other country has moved ahead. Separate rules apply if proceedings are also under way in Scotland or Northern Ireland.
If you think your spouse may begin proceedings in a country less favourable to you, take advice urgently. In some cases, the difference between issuing today and issuing next week determines which court decides your finances. That does not always mean rushing to court, but it does mean getting the analysis done before the other side acts.
Most international cases fall into a few recurring situations: British expats living abroad, couples where one spouse has moved overseas, families with assets or pensions in several countries, and claims after a divorce granted abroad. Each raises different questions about where to divorce and how to secure a fair financial outcome.
Often, yes. If you live in England and Wales, you can usually apply here once you have been habitually resident for a year, or for six months if you are also domiciled here. If you both live in Dubai, you may still be able to divorce in England if either of you remains domiciled here.
The UAE now allows many non-Muslim expatriates to divorce under civil family law rather than religious law, but its approach to finances differs significantly from England’s. Where both countries are available, careful advice on which is more appropriate, and on how an English order would be enforced against assets in the UAE, is essential before anything is issued.
Expat couples frequently keep an English domicile even after long periods overseas, particularly if they own property here, have children at school here or always planned to return. That domicile can give the English court jurisdiction, even if neither spouse has lived here recently. The court will look closely at the evidence of intention, so domicile is often contested.
You can still divorce here. The application can be served on your spouse abroad, and if they do not respond, the divorce can proceed. For finances, the court can make orders about assets anywhere in the world and draw adverse conclusions if your spouse refuses to disclose. Practical success depends on where the assets are, which is why enforcement is considered from the start.
An English court can only make a pension sharing order against a pension scheme based in the UK. It cannot directly split an overseas pension, such as a foreign employer or state scheme. Instead, the court usually offsets the overseas pension against other assets, or relies on an order from the court where the pension is held.
If the divorce happens abroad, a foreign court generally cannot split a UK pension either. A claim under Part III of the 1984 Act, explained below, may be the only way to share a UK pension after a foreign divorce. Planning which court deals with which pension is often critical to a fair outcome.
Possibly. Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 allows the English court to make financial orders after an overseas divorce has been recognised here. You need the court’s permission first, a sufficient connection to England and Wales, and a substantial reason why the English court should become involved.
You can apply if you have not remarried and, at the date of the foreign divorce or your application, either of you was domiciled in England and Wales or had been habitually resident here for at least a year. If neither applies, a claim may still be possible over a former matrimonial home in England and Wales, but only in relation to that property.
The court must be satisfied there is a substantial ground for the application. In Agbaje v Agbaje [2010], the Supreme Court said Part III exists to remedy real hardship or injustice, not to give a second bite at the cherry simply because England is more generous. Relevant factors include:
In Potanina v Potanin [2024], the Supreme Court confirmed that once permission is granted, it should only be set aside in limited circumstances, which gives successful applicants more certainty.
Usually. Under the Family Law Act 1986, a divorce obtained through court or similar proceedings abroad is generally recognised if it is effective in the country where it was granted and either spouse was habitually resident, domiciled or a national there. Recognition can be refused if one spouse was not properly notified or given a fair chance to take part. Divorces obtained without proceedings, such as some religious divorces, face stricter tests, particularly where either spouse lived in the UK at the time.
Often, but it depends on the type of order and the country. Maintenance orders benefit from international treaties and reciprocal arrangements, so they can usually be enforced in many countries. Lump sum, property and pension orders fall outside those treaties, and enforcing them abroad normally requires proceedings under the local country’s own law.
Since 1 January 2021, the UK has been a party in its own right to the 2007 Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance. It applies between the UK and all EU countries except Denmark, as well as other member countries including the USA. The UK also has reciprocal enforcement arrangements with many Commonwealth and other countries, administered by the REMO unit. GOV.UK explains how to get child maintenance if one parent lives abroad.
The English court can make orders about property and assets anywhere in the world, including ordering a spouse to transfer or sell a foreign property. But a foreign court will not necessarily give effect to that order directly. Common approaches include:
Because enforcement can determine whether an order is worth having, we consider it from the very first meeting, not after the order is made.
Arrangements for children are decided separately from the divorce, usually by the courts of the country where the child is habitually resident. The child’s welfare is the court’s paramount consideration. Where parents live in different countries, the key questions are which court decides, whether a child can move abroad, and how contact will work across borders.
In most cases, the courts of the country where the child habitually lives. The 1996 Hague Child Protection Convention, in force in the UK since 2012 and applying with all EU countries after Brexit, sets this rule between member countries and allows orders made in one to be recognised in another. A divorce being heard in England does not automatically mean the English court can decide arrangements for children living abroad.
Only with the written consent of everyone with parental responsibility, or the court’s permission. Removing a child under 16 from the UK without consent can be a criminal offence under the Child Abduction Act 1984. A parent named in a child arrangements order as someone the child lives with may take the child abroad for up to a month without consent, unless the order says otherwise.
If the other parent objects, you can apply to the court for permission to relocate. The court considers the child’s welfare as a whole, including the reasons for the move, the plans for schooling and housing, and how the relationship with the other parent will be maintained. There is no presumption either way, and a detailed, realistic plan is essential.
Contact arrangements need careful drafting when parents live in different countries: who pays for travel, how passports are held, and what happens during holidays. Where a child will spend time in a country outside the 1980 Hague Convention, the court may require safeguards such as a mirror order in that country or a financial guarantee before allowing travel. Judges can also communicate directly across borders through the International Family Justice Office, which supports cross-border cases involving children.
If a child is taken to, or kept in, another country without the other parent’s consent or a court order, it may be international child abduction. Where that country has signed the 1980 Hague Convention, the left-behind parent can apply for the child’s prompt return. Where it has not, the options are more limited and urgent specialist advice is vital.
The 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction requires member countries to return a child wrongfully removed from, or kept away from, the country where they habitually lived. The court where the child now is does not decide the long-term arrangements. It decides only whether the child should go back, so the home country’s courts can decide the rest.
Applications go through a central authority in each country. In England and Wales, this is the International Child Abduction and Contact Unit. Courts aim to decide return applications within six weeks. A return can be refused only on narrow grounds, including:
Some countries, including the UAE and India, have not signed the 1980 Convention, so there is no treaty route for return. Options can include asking the English High Court to make the child a ward of court, starting proceedings in the other country, mediation, and diplomatic support from the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. GOV.UK publishes guidance on international parental child abduction, including country-specific information.
Act immediately. If removal is imminent, call the police, who can issue an alert to ports and airports. A solicitor can apply urgently for a prohibited steps order preventing removal and for passports to be surrendered to the court. Our international child abduction page explains the steps in more detail.
Yes. Nationality is not one of the tests. What matters is habitual residence or domicile in England and Wales, so foreign nationals living here can usually divorce here.
An English court is not bound by a foreign prenuptial agreement or matrimonial property regime, but it will usually give it significant weight if it was entered into freely and with a proper understanding of its effect. Radmacher v Granatino [2010], which established the modern approach, itself concerned an agreement signed in Germany.
A mahr or similar religious marriage contract is not automatically enforced as part of an English divorce. The court can take it into account as one of the circumstances of the case, and in some situations it may be enforceable as a contract.
Often, yes. Your English solicitor can advise on English law and strategy, but questions about the other country’s law, recognition of orders and enforcement against assets there need a local lawyer.
The divorce itself takes at least 26 weeks in England, as it does for any couple. Finances and children can take longer where there is a dispute about jurisdiction, assets abroad or enforcement. A jurisdiction dispute alone can add several months.
In an international case, the most important decisions are often made before anything is filed: which country to divorce in, how quickly to act, and how any order will be enforced. Our family law team advises on divorces involving expats, overseas spouses, foreign assets and pensions, financial claims after a foreign divorce, and children moving or taken abroad.
Austin Kemp is ranked in The Legal 500, which notes the team’s work on divorce and family breakdown cases with complex and international elements. You may also find our guides to high net worth divorce and financial settlements helpful.
If you or your spouse live abroad, or you are worried proceedings may start in another country, speak to an international divorce solicitor as early as possible.
SRA Number 837569
Clarity, Control and Strategic Strength in International Family Law
When family law crosses borders, complexity increases and mistakes become costly.
Hayley Jetson advises high net worth and internationally mobile clients on complex divorce, financial disputes, and children matters. Her experience spans both England and Hong Kong, giving her a truly international perspective that is critical in modern family law.
She is trusted by clients who expect precision, discretion, and a clear strategy from the outset. Whether dealing with substantial wealth, jurisdiction disputes, or sensitive children matters, Hayley brings control and structure to situations that can otherwise feel overwhelming.
International Expertise. Commercial Awareness. Absolute Focus.
Hayley’s practice covers:
Why Instruct Hayley Jetson?
Because international family law demands more than technical knowledge.
It requires experience across jurisdictions, the ability to coordinate multiple professionals, and the judgement to make the right strategic decisions at the right time.
Hayley combines international experience with sharp legal thinking and a grounded, pragmatic approach. She understands what is at stake and works to protect her clients’ position with precision and care.
If you are dealing with a complex or international family matter, Hayley provides the clarity and strength needed to move forward with confidence.
For more information: https://austinkemp.co.uk/people/hayley-jetson/
DivorceAI is an AI powered tool we've developed to help our clients ask questions and get quick answers regarding divorce.
Get quick answersAccredited to the highest standards in the industry

Submit your details, and we'll arrange a free, no-obligation callback at a time to suit you. Please note that we cannot offer Legal Aid.