We help make the financial side of getting a divorce as simple as possible, whilst retaining what you deserve.
Our international divorce lawyers regularly advise on cases involving complex international aspects.
The breakdown of a relationship can often be a difficult and emotional time. Our separation and divorce lawyers support and offer advice on pre-civil partnership agreements, post-civil partnership agreements, civil partnership dissolution, and finances when a civil partnership ends.
Our family law solicitors are experienced in providing support for families experiencing difficult changes in their lives, including breakdowns in relationships and changes to family life.
At Austin Kemp, we’re here to help. Find out more about the divorce process, and other key information with our vast resource section.
Our industry-first Divorce Report combines numerous data sources and internal research, to bring you this specialist report.
Our expert divorce lawyers have listed questions which are commonly asked by our clients, to which we have provided an answer.
Our legal videos break down the complexity and jargon within our profession.
Our Legal Brochures detail the process for each area of Family Law. Download your brochure and learn more about what is involved in this complicated legal topic.
Our Legal Experts have written insights to help you navigate divorce and family law.
Thoroughly excellent service provided via Wikivorce. Was slightly apprehensive of how it would all work, especially at a distance. However, they were swift, efficient, immensely polite, accurate, and gave regular updates. I would recommend them to anyone.
Can't fault my experience in any way. Brilliant advice / available at short notice for any questions and most importantly swiftly achieved the desired result. Found Austin Kemp after feeling HCB Solicitors were not acting in my best interests and I was correct on all fronts - even including having an appreciation for the fact Divorce is already emotional situation. Also, rather than have to query every suggested next step and be charged for the pleasure; As I'd done a little research of my own and was able to challenge their advice - however we pay Solicitors for their expertise and need to put our trust in them. Austin Kemp thankfully achieved that for me during our first conversation I was already reassured they understood what I wanted and how best to achieve it. Resulting in 7-8 months less work and no court appearances as I had been previously advised by HCB. I THANK YOU DEARLY AUSTIN KEMP. I can start my life again earlier and with a healthier bank balance because of you!!!
Amazing service. For the first time in nearly two years I feel less in a spiral and more in control.
Thoroughly professional, straightforward, timely and reasonably priced. I would recommend this firm to anyone. Thank you Emma and Austen Kemp for a great service.
Thank you so much. You were great. I wasted so much time and money with my previous solicitors and only regret I did not contact you earlier. I have dropped a line to Paul to thank him for referring me to you. I hope you enjoyed the red I sent you as a token of our appreciation.
Austin Kemp provides a pragmatic and honest approach to the individual's journey through Family Law issues. They demonstrate a willingness and capacity to respond to challenging and unpredictable circumstances. The professional, yet personal, service is naturally client centred, but with a realistic and informed view of children's needs. And it has been heartening to have such a caring team walk beside me in the long journey.
I cannot recommend highly enough Austin Kemp as a strong, commercially intelligent and the most effective negotiators. Their negotiation skills are second to none. I have seen firsthand the excellent results this team achieves for their clients.
Just want to say thanks so much for everything. You have been brilliant and very patient. I always felt comfortable calling when asking to clarify certain points of the divorce.
I can honestly say that I am more than satisfied with the management of my case and of my then state of mind. I highly recommend this firm. Thank you.
Amandeep Kooner was not prepared to be swayed from a path of professionalism to accommodate my anxiety and frustration. He would not succumb to taking instructions tit for tat response. He ensured at all times that the response he gave reflected a dignified client with a pleasant demeanour. In so doing he demonstrated his commitment to protect and secure my interests and dignity off which I am most grateful.
Although he has a dual approached role which is business and a duty of care, Amandeep Kooner showed concerns for the level of expenditure that I had already put out with no resolve. His team contained the work to the minimum and produced the maximum results. My case was quickly progressed without compromising compassion and understanding.
Very professional service! Explained everything they were doing for my case every step of the way and really helped me to understand how we would proceed. Thank you!
Intellectually bright, hardworking and extremely professional - Amandeep Kooner took my case at it most difficult as I had come to the end of my ability to remain calm and patient. Up until I instructed Austin Kemp, I had lost all hope that any solicitor could convince me in pursuing a non-retaliatory approach as I was losing ground to allegations and fabrications. Tough, hardworking and extremely professional.
We previously examined if it reasonable to question unreasonable behaviour in a divorce and further examined a recent ruling, of the court of appeal which refused to allow a woman to divorce her husband because of his ‘unreasonable behaviour’. No doubt this is a topical area of divorce law.
Going through a divorce is one of the biggest upheavals many of us will face in our lifetimes. As solicitors, we spend a lot of our time and focus on the financial aspect of the divorce process, because, as we have discussed in some of our previous posts, the financial settlement is often the element that takes the longest to resolve.
When a celebrity or high net worth individual divorce ‘battle’ is reported in the media, it is usually how their assets will be divided upon divorce which can make the divorce process seem so lengthy.
Before getting into discussions about who will get what, there is an important part of the early divorce process itself that needs to be dealt with.
If you want a divorce in England and Wales, you will need to show that your marriage has irretrievably broken down.
It is possible to do this by establishing one of five acts:
In order to cite adultery as grounds for divorce, you will need to establish that your spouse has had sex with a member of the opposite sex. However, it’s important to point out that if you discovered this more than 6 months previously and continued to live with your spouse as a couple during this time, you won’t be able to use adultery as a reason for divorce.
If you and your spouse have lived apart from each other for more than 2 years and you both agree to the divorce taking place, you can use this as the reason that you are divorcing.
If you and your spouse have been separated and lived apart from each other for more than 5 years, you can cite this as a reason for your divorce. Unlike the reason above (separation for more than 2 years), your spouse does not have to agree for you to use this reason.
In order to use desertion as grounds for your divorce, you will have to show that your husband or wife has left you for more than 2 years in the past 2.5 years. It’s vital that they left you without your agreement, without a good reason and that they did it so that they could end your relationship. Even if you have lived together with your spouse for up to 6 months in this time period, you could still use desertion as grounds for divorce.
Unreasonable behaviour is the most common ground for divorce in England and Wales. We will discuss why this is the case in more detail, below.
In order to use unreasonable behaviour as grounds for divorce, you will need to show that your spouse has behaved so badly that you can’t reasonably be expected to live with them any longer.
If you are the petitioner (the person who files the divorce petition) and are citing unreasonable behaviour as your grounds for divorce, you will need to give at least one example of this behaviour. How many examples you will need to provide depends upon various factors, so it’s a good idea to seek advice from a specialist solicitor.
However, there is nothing to tell you what is and what is not deemed as unreasonable behaviour.
In law, unreasonable behaviour is defined as:
“That the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent.”
In essence, this means that the courts will look at whether you can reasonably be expected to still live with your spouse, despite their behaviour.
What is and what is not unreasonable behaviour can be very subjective. One person may find the way that their spouse is behaving is completely unacceptable, whereas this type of behaviour may not bother another person at all.
For example, a wife may say that her husband is spending too much time training for triathlons and other sporting events and consequentially is not spending enough time with her. Another person may see this as a benefit, as they have more time to take part in hobbies of their own.
Common examples of unreasonable behaviour include excessive drinking or gambling problems.
As most divorces are undefended, unreasonable behaviour rarely gets tested in the courts. However, one such (very unusual) case, involved a woman who was refused a divorce from her husband. She is now reportedly going to argue that she should not have to prove unreasonable behaviour and is heading to the Supreme Court to do this.
In their latest statistical bulletin regarding Divorces in England and Wales: 2016, the Office for National Statistics reported that unreasonable behaviour remained the most common grounds for opposite-sex couples divorcing.
The ONS said that 36% of all husbands and 51% of all wives petitioned for divorce on these grounds.
In its report, the ONS stated that: “Unreasonable behaviour has consistently been the most common ground for wives petitioning for divorce since the late 1970s; previous to this, the ground was named “cruelty”.”
Interestingly, unreasonable behaviour has only been the most common ground for husbands petitioning, since 2006. Prior to this, in the 1980s and 1990s, adultery was the most common ground for this group, whereas between 1999 – 2005, it was separation for more than 2 years (with consent)
One of the possible reasons that unreasonable behaviour is the most common ground for divorce, is that out of the four other grounds, three of these require a wait of a number of years before they can be used as grounds for divorce.
The only other ground left that doesn’t require a lengthy wait to divorce, is adultery. However, adultery can be more difficult to prove than unreasonable behaviour.
Also, although there is no such thing as a ‘no-fault’ divorce in England and Wales (more on this below), citing unreasonable behaviour as grounds for divorce, can often be less inflammatory than adultery and can sometimes help to keep the divorce process more amicable.
Additionally, contrary to popular belief, adultery in the eyes of the law involves sexual intercourse with someone of the opposite sex. Other kinds of sexual contact or a sexual relationship with someone of the same sex, cannot be used to establish adultery in a divorce petition.
Moreover, adultery can’t be given as a reason for divorce if you continued to live with your spouse as a couple for 6 months after you discovered what they had been doing.
All of this means that unreasonable behaviour has come to be used as the most common ground for divorce.
Back in 2015, the Independent published an article regarding research by family justice campaign group Resolution, which revealed that over 27% of couples who cited unreasonable behaviour “admitted their claims were not true, but were the easiest way of getting a divorce”.
Resolution’s chair at the time, Jo Edwards, reportedly said: “As our research findings show, the current system is causing couples to make false allegations in court in order to have their divorce finalised within a reasonable time. This charade needs to be ended.
“The alternative, living for two years as a separated couple before divorce proceedings can be started, is financially and emotionally untenable for many people.”
In England and Wales there is currently no such thing as a ‘no-fault’ divorce. It is unavoidable that this blame creates animosity between the divorcing couple.
Many argue that this system of blame is not only archaic but it is also damaging, as it causes resentment between the couple at a time when they need to work together to come to an agreement about what will happen to their children and their assets, when they go their separate ways.
Some say that unnecessary confrontation, which is fuelled by the need to point the finger of blame at someone for the breakdown of the relationship, has become commonplace. Many couples may like to end their marriage on better terms, to cite that neither of them were to blame and their marriage has simply has come to an end. However, under the current divorce system in England and Wales, this is simply not possible.
Although no-one is arguing that all divorces could ever be completely amicable, it does seem logical to assume that if there was a ‘no-fault’ divorce where no blame was necessary, things could be, more often than not, a little less hostile.
Indeed, many believe that until there is a ‘no-fault’ divorce where there is no need to apportion blame, the current system is going to continue to stoke the flames of confrontation between divorcing couples.
Commenting on the most recent official statistics from the ONS on the number of divorces in England and Wales, Resolution chair, Nigel Shepherd said:
“…there are tens of thousands of couples who are currently discouraged by the current system from taking a non-confrontational approach to divorce . For many separating couples, the need to apportion blame on the divorce petition can introduce unnecessary conflict, which adds to the stress and heartache for the couple themselves and, crucially, any children they may have.”
“For decades, ‘unreasonable behaviour’ has been the most common reason for divorce among opposite-sex couples, yet many are forced into playing this ‘blame game’ by our archaic divorce laws.”
“That’s why we have repeatedly called on government to legislate for no-fault divorce, and will continue to do so. This call is echoed by senior legal figures, such as Baroness Hale, the President of the Supreme Court, and Sir Paul Coleridge, the Chair of the Marriage Foundation.”
“In the face of such overwhelming support, and with the Supreme Court due next Spring to hear the appeal of Mrs Owens, whose divorce has been denied because of the current law, the government needs to listen and take action. It’s time to make no-fault the default.”
Until the law changes and unless you and your spouse are willing to wait 2 years in order to separate with consent (or use the other grounds that involve waiting), you will need to cite either unreasonable behaviour or adultery on your divorce petition.
It can sometimes be helpful to talk to your spouse about the grounds and examples that will be cited on the divorce petition.
A mediator, an independent third party, could help you with these discussions if you wish. Alternatively, you could seek advice from solicitors experienced in collaborative law. Collaborative law is a process involving four-way meetings with you, your spouse and your respective solicitors, which take place with the aim of coming to an agreement about various elements of your divorce. Through these mediums, you could work with your spouse to come to agreement about the reasons you will cite for divorce.
This could not only reduce the chance of your spouse disputing your claims but it may also make your relationship with your spouse more amicable, which could help when it comes to discussing and negotiating a financial settlement.
Whilst in England and Wales it usually makes no difference who files for the divorce and who is the respondent, this may not be the case if your divorce goes through in another jurisdiction. This means that it’s vital to get legal advice as soon as possible if you think there could be an international element to your divorce.
In order to get a divorce in England and Wales, you will need to show that your marriage has irretrievably broken down. It is possible to do this by establishing one of five facts or “grounds”. Unreasonable behaviour is one of the five possible grounds for divorce in England and Wales.
Out of all of the grounds for divorce, unreasonable behaviour is the one which is most commonly cited and as such, unreasonable behaviour examples are one of the issues we’re often asked about as specialist divorce solicitors.
To establish ‘unreasonable behaviour’, the petitioner (the person filing for the divorce) must show that their spouse has behaved in such a way that they cannot reasonably be expected to live with them anymore. They will need to give unreasonable behaviour examples in the divorce petition.
In essence, this means that the courts will look at whether you can reasonably be expected to still live with your spouse, despite their behaviour (as shown in your unreasonable behaviour examples).
There are many unreasonable behaviour examples that could be cited on a divorce petition. However, before we get into specific unreasonable behaviour examples, it’s important to note that there is no legal definition of exactly what does and what doesn’t constitute unreasonable behaviour. What’s more, as the majority of divorces are undefended, unreasonable behaviour examples are rarely tested in court.
How many unreasonable behaviour examples you will need to provide depends upon various factors, so it’s a good idea to seek advice from a specialist solicitor.
When it comes to divorce, unreasonable behaviour can be very subjective. What one person may see as unreasonable behaviour, may not bother another person at all. This means that there is a large range of unreasonable behaviour examples stated on divorce petitions.
For example, a wife may say that her husband is spending too much time training for triathlons and other sporting events and consequentially is not spending enough time with her. Another person may see this as a benefit, as they have more time to partake in hobbies of their own.
Common unreasonable behaviour examples include excessive drinking or gambling problems.
A divorce with unreasonable behaviour as the ground can take anything from 6 months to over a year, depending on the complexity of the case.
Often, it is the financial settlement (which is normally conducted in parallel with the divorce process), which takes the time, rather than the divorce for unreasonable behaviour itself.
As well as divorce for unreasonable behaviour, there are four other possible grounds for divorce:
• Adultery – you will need to establish that your spouse has had sex with a member of the opposite sex
• Separation for more than 2 years (with consent)
• Separation for 5 years (without consent)
Other than adultery, which can be more difficult to prove than unreasonable behaviour, the other grounds require a wait of a number of years before they can be used as grounds for divorce.
Most divorces in England and Wales go through uncontested, without either spouse defending the divorce. This means that unreasonable behaviour is rarely tested in the courts.
If you don’t agree that unreasonable behaviour is the reason for your marriage breaking down, you are legally entitled to defend the divorce. Defending a divorce can be both costly and time-consuming and ultimately, the judge may decide that they will grant the divorce anyway.
If you agree to the divorce but disagree with the unreasonable behaviour that your spouse has cited, you may want to state this in the “Acknowledgement of Service” document. Alternatively, you may want to submit a Cross Petition.
Sometimes, talking to your spouse and agreeing the grounds and examples that will be cited on the divorce petition before applying for a divorce, can help to avoid conflict further down the line. However, this will not be possible (or indeed advised) in all instances, particularly if there is an international element to the divorce. Always seek advice from a solicitor regarding your specific circumstances.
Unreasonable behaviour is the most frequently cited ground for divorce in England and Wales. In this article, we will tell you what unreasonable behaviour divorce means and reveal some typical examples of unreasonable behaviour.
Getting a divorce in England and Wales is only possible if you show that your marriage has irretrievably broken down.
The irretrievable breakdown of a marriage can currently only be demonstrated (for the purposes of divorce) by establishing one of five facts (or grounds):
2. Unreasonable behaviour
3. Separation for more than 2 years (with consent)
4. Separation for 5 years (no consent necessary)
In order to apply for divorce on the ground of unreasonable behaviour, the person filing for the divorce – known as the petitioner – must show that their spouse has behaved in such a way that they cannot reasonably be expected to live with them any longer.
The petitioner will need to give at least one example of unreasonable behaviour when relying on this ground for divorce.
How many examples you should give will depend upon a range of different factors. So if you want to cite unreasonable behaviour in divorce, it’s always a good idea to seek advice from a solicitor.
There is no unreasonable behaviour divorce “checklist” that you can refer to in order to see if the behaviour you are describing could be interpreted as unreasonable.
Legally, unreasonable behaviour in divorce is described like this:
“That the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent.”
What this really means is that the courts will consider whether you can reasonably be expected to continue living with your spouse, despite the behaviour in question.
Unreasonable behaviour is defined as follows: “That the respondent has behaved in such a way that the petitioner cannot reasonably be expected to live with the respondent.”
If you are using unreasonable behaviour as your reason for divorce, you will need to provide at least one example of this behaviour.
However, there is no unreasonable behaviour ‘checklist’ that you can use to see if your spouse’s behaviour does indeed amount to unreasonable behaviour.
Unreasonable behaviour is very subjective. What one person may view as unreasonable behaviour, may not seem bothersome to another person at all.
For example, one spouse may say that their other half is spending too much time on the golf course and not enough time at home. For another couple, this could be a positive, as the non-golf-playing spouse has plenty of time to pursue their own interests.
Examples of unreasonable behaviour cited when applying for a divorce, include verbal or physical abuse and excessive drinking.
Unreasonable behaviour in divorce is very subjective. What you may think is unacceptable behaviour, may not cause a problem in another relationship.
If, for example, your spouse spends every spare moment cycling, rather than with spending time with you, you could think it unreasonable of them to behave like this. Another person may be relieved their spouse is not at home very much, so they have more time for their own interests.
One example of unreasonable behaviour that is often cited is excessive drinking. Others include, but are not limited to:
• Verbal abuse
• Lack of sex
• Lack of support
• Domestic abuse
As defended (or contested) divorces are relatively rare, what constitutes unreasonable behaviour is rarely put to the test in the courts.
Divorce timescales can vary significantly. Usually, it takes between 6 months to a year to get a divorce. It can take much longer than this, especially if a financial settlement cannot be agreed. Usually, it is the financial negotiations which lengthen the divorce process, rather than the divorce itself.
An unreasonable behaviour divorce can take anything from 6 months to over a year. The precise period of time will depend upon a number of different factors, including the complexity of the finances of each spouse.
The majority of the time, it is the financial settlement which lengthens the divorce process, rather than the unreasonable behaviour divorce itself.
Our expert divorce solicitors can help you with a range of legal issues relating to child abduction, including:
For more information call our divorce solicitors on 0845 862 5001 or email email@example.com.
Our expert divorce solicitors offer a nationwide service. We have client meeting office facilities available, in order to have face-to-face client meetings / conferences as and when required in:
Leeds Office: St Andrew House, The Headrow, Leeds, LS1 5JW
Wakefield Office: Market Walk, Wakefield, WF1 1QR
Halifax Office: Old Lane, Halifax, HX3 5WP
Huddersfield Office: Northumberland Street Huddersfield, HD1 1RL
Coventry Office: Warwick Road, Coventry, CV1 2DY
Canary Wharf Office: 25 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London, E14 5LB
Please contact us for more details.